KVM - The Linux Kernel-Based Virtual Machine
News, Blogs and Resources on the Linux (KVM) Kernel-Based Virtual Machine

ASUS still fails?

1 reply [Last post]
shadowbox
Offline
Joined: Mar 9 2010
Points: 17

I've read elsewhere that ASUS boards which include Intel chipsets that theoretically support VT-d haven't implemented the chipset correctly. I'm now in the market for a new MB and I'd like to get VT-d if possible, but the Intel boards are weak. Does anyone know if the ASUS problems with VT-d implementation have been patched or are still hosed?

Kenni Lund
Offline
Joined: Nov 25 2008
Points: 88
RE: ASUS still fails?

What do you mean by "Intel boards are weak"? In terms of other features, or?

Intel invented VT-d, if someone knows how to implement a new bleeding edge Intel technology like VT-d, that would be Intel.

I have a Gigabyte motherboard on which I have enabled VT-d through some hidden advanced options in the BIOS. It works, but I have some weird problems with some cards, which might be related to the Gigabyte BIOS implementation (beta feature). I'm upgrading my motherboard once again, this time to a Intel board with the new Q57 chipset.

Asus is AFAIK completely broken in terms of VT-d support, and trust me, you will run into plenty of other software bugs and limitations with the current VT-d/passthrough KVM implementation, so the last thing you want is a semi-broken hardware/motherboard implementation of VT-d. I would 100% go for a Intel board at the moment, as it gives you the highest possibility of success with passthrough.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
Type the characters you see in this picture. (verify using audio)
Type the characters you see in the picture above; if you can't read them, submit the form and a new image will be generated. Not case sensitive.